Cited diligence for VCs, angels & funds

Cited diligence your fund can act on — and defend.

A company or founder in, a cited RISK × UPSIDE verdict out — in hours. Every finding traces to its source document, with continuous monitoring and alerts on new adverse signals.

Continuous monitoring & adverse-signal alertsVolume API for deal pipelinesNever guesses — every finding is cited

Built on public data sources

Public, re-verifiable sources — click any finding to check it yourself. Your subjects are never used to train a model.

The moat

The opposite of a black box.

One verdict, read two ways: defensible enough for your investment committee, transparent enough for your engineers.

For the buyer

  • Defensible to your investment committee and your LPs
  • Hours, not a weeks-long cycle
  • Built on source documents anyone can re-verify
  • No proprietary lock-in

For the builder

  • Every finding resolves to a source-document URL
  • Deterministic risk & upside scoring, not model guesses
  • Tamper-evident, hash-chained audit trail
  • Self-hosted models — no third party sees your deal flow

The problem

A multi-million-dollar check shouldn't rest on a memo you can't audit.

If you run diligence at a fund, you know the math: a slow, five-figure background check is fine on the deals you close and pure loss on the ones you pass — and a partner can still pick the findings apart. The same is true for an angel or family office making an irreversible bet. Today that evidence arrives slow, opaque, and impossible to check.

Speed

A weeks-long diligence write-up is too slow for a deal that keeps moving. By the time the memo lands, the round has narrowed — or closed.

Defensibility

When your investment committee — or an LP — asks where a finding came from, "the analyst flagged it" is not an answer. You need a verdict anyone can trace back to a source document.

Cost

Bespoke background checks and diligence consulting cost four or five figures per company — before you have even decided whether the deal is worth pursuing.

How it works

Company in. Cited verdict out. In hours.

1

Resolve the subject

Name a company or founder. We resolve it to registry records, officers, and beneficial owners — then pull the source documents behind every entity, with nothing leaving our infrastructure for a third-party model.

2

Pull signals + score

We scan adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, litigation, insolvency and director-disqualification records — plus funding, hiring, patents, launches and web-tech — then run deterministic scorers for risk and upside.

3

Cited verdict

You get a fused risk × upside scorecard — strong & clean, promising but risky, clean but quiet, or avoid — where every finding carries its source document plus a tamper-evident hash. Export it, or keep monitoring for new signals.

How it compares

Faster than a manual report. Defensible unlike a chatbot.

A diligence verdict that's quick to get and impossible to wave away.

CapabilityManual reportBlack-box AIMarketPrior
TurnaroundDaysMinutesHours
Every finding traced to a public source
Deterministic scorers (re-runnable)
Tamper-evident audit chain
Continuous monitoring & alerts
Your subjects never train a model
Cost per companyHigh (analyst time)LowFlat per-report

For developers

A diligence verdict from one API call.

POST a company or founder, get back a cited, scored, audit-logged verdict.

  • One POST, a fully cited, scored verdict back.
  • Token auth + per-tenant isolation — your data never trains a model.
  • Tamper-evident audit hash on every response.
Full API reference →
POST /v1/diligence
curl https://api.marketprior.com/v1/diligence \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -d '{"subject":"Acme, Inc."}'

# response — every finding carries its source
# verdict:        PROMISING BUT RISKY
# risk_score:     62/100 (source: sanctions, litigation)
# upside_score:   74/100 (source: funding, hiring)
# audit_hash:     e7a1…9f  (tamper-evident chain)

For your agents

diligence MCP

Use it from Claude, Cursor, or your own agent.

Connect our MCP server and ask for a cited diligence verdict in plain language. Citations and audit hash included.

Connect the MCP server →

Design partners

Onboarding a small group of design partners.

These slots are placeholders — we won't show a logo until a partner has agreed to be named.

Logo slot
Logo slot
Logo slot
Logo slot

Companies assessed in private beta: — placeholder —

Pricing

Per-company or annual. No per-seat.

Pay per diligence run, or go annual for unlimited assessments across your team.

See pricing →

FAQ

Questions, answered honestly.

You name a company or founder. It returns a fused RISK × UPSIDE scorecard — adverse media, sanctions, PEP, litigation, insolvency and director-disqualification records on the risk side; funding, hiring, patents, launches and web-tech on the upside — plus a verdict (strong & clean, promising but risky, clean but quiet, or avoid). Every finding is cited to its source document (company registries, court and insolvency records, sanctions lists, filings, news archives). Nothing is an unsourced "AI guess".

See a verdict you can actually check.

Name a company or founder. We'll return a fully cited risk × upside verdict you can trace, line by line, back to source documents — yours to keep monitoring, defend at IC, or share with an LP.